Kirkland Council backs neighbors, dismisses Potala Village settlement

The proposed Potala Village project calls for 143 luxury apartment units on a 1.2 acre lot with a view of Lake Washington. It will also have 6,000 square feet of retail space and retail parking. - Contributed
Contributed
The proposed Potala Village project calls for 143 luxury apartment units on a 1.2 acre lot with a view of Lake Washington. It will also have 6,000 square feet of retail space and retail parking.

By RAECHEL DAWSON
Kirkland Reporter Reporter
November 21, 2012 · 12:18 PM

The Kirkland City Council did not approve a proposed Potala Village settlement agreement last night put forth by developer Lobsang Dargey and his wife Tamara Agassi Dargey.

When it was time to address the resolution during the Nov. 20 council meeting, no council members made a motion. The same inaction occurred when the mayor asked for a motion to halt the current moratorium on the Neighborhood Business (BN) zones.

This is the fourth moratorium against development on the Lake Street BN zone.

When Dargey initially submitted the project proposal last year, it sparked a controversy between more than 1,000 nearby residents, the developer and the city over the project’s scale and neighborhood impacts. Potala Village is a proposed 143 apartment unit project on a 1.2 acre lot with a view of Lake Washington in the Moss Bay neighborhood. The building would have 6,000 square feet of retail space, plus retail parking.

The Dargey’s agreed to a settlement on Nov. 2 that would have called for the council to lift the moratorium, currently set to end on Dec. 31, and allow for the developers to submit a building permit application for the property of no more than 100 residential units with commercial space on the bottom, which is allowed under the current BN zone laws.

Additionally, the plaintiffs agreed in the settlement to specific design elements, but asked the city to forgo the design review process.

The settlement asked the city to process their substantial development permit and environmental impact statements in a quick manner and refrain from any changes on the BN zones before the plaintiffs could submit their building permit application. Under current law, the property would be eligible for 1.7 parking spaces per multi-family residential unit.

Among other terms, both parties would have had to agree to stay the current litigation.

Although the council did not approve the settlement agreement, they did pass a motion to bring back a zoning ordinance for the Dec. 11 meeting, which calls for a residential zoning density of 48 units per acre in the BN zones, according to city attorney Robin Jenkinson.

Lake Street area resident Tom Grimm, Peter Powell and View Pointe board president Jack Arndt praised the council for listening to citizen’s concerns and urged them to pass the 48 units per acre zoning ordinance, despite their initial wish for 12 units per acre.

“We ask you to reject the settlement proposal,” Grimm said, “and adopt the zoning ordinance of 48 units per acre. We really are here to reach a compromise.”

Arndt pointed out the law would allow for 58 units on the 1.2 acre property. Anything larger would reduce the property value of the surrounding homes, he says.

If this ordinance passes, Jenkinson said the Potala project would be “subject to the next new zoning” after the moratorium was lifted at the end of December.

Jenkinson said the plaintiffs still have a pending lawsuit against the city and have the opportunity to add additional claims.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Contact Kirkland Reporter Reporter Raechel Dawson at rdawson@kirklandreporter.com or 425-822-9166 X5052.

Comment on this story.

COMMENTING RULES: We encourage an open exchange of ideas in our online community, but we ask you to follow our guidelines for respecting community standards. In a nutshell, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. Please see our FAQ if you have questions or concerns about using Facebook to comment.

So keep your comments:

  • Civil
  • Smart
  • On-topic
  • Free of profanity

We ask that all participants own their words by logging in with their Facebook account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and “drive-by” commenters. We reserve the right to remove comments from anyone using screen names, pseudonyms or false identities. Please refer to our Terms of Use for full detail on participating on our site.