Sound Transit proposal not the right plan
Oct 30 2008
I have the highest regards for Mayor Ava Frisinger and Councilor Fred Butler, but I must disagree with their joint letter of support for Sound Transit in the Reporter last week.
The primary consideration for any mass transit rider ship is population density. Such density would require some 80,000 people to live within the current city limits of some 20,000 residents. We do not now have that in Puget Sound and will not have it in even the unforeseeable (distant) future to the extent needed to support light rail.
Further, the cost of some $17 billion will provide some 12 – 15 stations on routes now well served by at least two bus routes. For that same price, we could rebuild all of the Alaskan Way viaduct (probably including the Seawall), the SR-520 Bridge, (both projects probably in any scenario now under discussion) with money left over for considerable improvements, including bus rapid transit, to our bus system. One caveat, I am talking about only the total funding raised by the $0.005 sales tax increase and not what would need to be done to make these funds available for other projects. We have higher priority transportation (both transit and roads) needs that light rail can never replace, and it is never the right time to do the wrong thing. Paying $17 billion dollars for light rail is the wrong thing.
-Rowan C. Hinds
Former Issaquah mayor and Reporter editorial board member
- Civil
- Smart
- On-topic
- Free of profanity
We ask that all participants own their words by registering for an account. It's a simple process that will take seconds and helps keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and drive-by commenters.
As a community site, we ask that the community help by using the "Flag" button on each comment if they feel the comment has violated the rules. You can also use the up and down arrows on each comment to voice your opinion about that particular comment.
Want to tell us something but you don't want it to be public? Talk to us privately.
